In re Englander Spring Bed Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion to approve of the proposed plan of reorganization offered by the debtor as amended and for allowances.
No one appeared in opposition to the motion to approve plan except on behalf of the certificate holders of the first mortgage, and the only brief submitted on their behalf being that submitted by the *17attorneys for the Brooklyn mortgage creditors.
Their objection was to paragraph XI of the amended plan of reorganization, in which it is provided that the Brooklyn plant of the debtor shall be transferred to a corporation “subject to the lien of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Murel Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Tennessee Pub. Co. v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- In re SoltmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Central States Life Ins. v. Koplar Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.