Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Company v. Intermotive, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 15, 2024No. 4:17-cv-11584Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FORD MOTOR COMPANY, AND 4:17-CV-11584-TGB-APP FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, HON. TERRENCE G. BERG Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, OPINION AND ORDER DENYING INTERMOTIVE’S v. MOTION FOR AN INCREASED PROFITS AWARD INTERMOTIVE, INC., AND (ECF NO. 257) GREGORY E. SCHAFFER, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. Ford Motor Company has been suing, and been sued by, InterMotive, the maker of a device called the “Upfitter Interface Module” or “UIM,” for nearly seven years. Ford initially claimed that InterMotive was using the Ford…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- U.S. Structures, Incorporated, a Foreign Corporation v. J.P. Structures, Incorporated, a Michigan Corporation, and Joseph J. PilatCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Wynn Oil Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. American Way Service Corporation, and Thomas A. Warmus, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.