Legal Opinion

State v. Marble

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 18, 1995No. 71,393PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larson, J.:

James B. Marble appeals his conviction after a jury trial of one count of aggravated criminal sodomy, K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 21-3506, contending that the prosecution improperly questioned him on cross-examination, the judge erroneously communicated ex parte with a juror, the trial court erred in excluding evidence impeaching the State’s complaining witness, and the trial court improperly failed to grant a downward durational departure during sentencing.

The facts arise out of a July 1993 incident involving Marble and S.W. The versions of the incident are predictably divergent.

S.W.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. The PEOPLE v. NuccioIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. State v. ToshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. CravattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Bruch v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API