Legal Opinion

Una v. Dodd

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On petition and answers and proofs taken in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Yan Fleet, Y. C.

The question to be decided in this case is whether certain persons now before the court on a charge of contempt, should be adjudged guilty or not. They are charged with having contumaciously violated an order of this court. It is important that the circumstances under which this order was made should be stated.

The managers of the Newark Savings Institution, on the 12th of Decembei’, 1877, represented to the chancellor, by petition, *175that while the corporation under their charge was the owner of ■sufficient assets estimated at their face value to pay all of its depositors in-…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  4. The People v. . SturtevantNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. Huntington v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warmolts v. HoltNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. Schuler v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. State v. ShumakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Thomas v. FlanaganNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API