Lee v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
We are of the opinion that the questions numbered 1 and 2, set forth above, should be answered in the negative. In the case of Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Bolton, 22 Ga. App. 566 (96 S. E. 442), it was said: “In general, it may be said that the test, in determining whether questions contained in an application for insurance are material, is whether knowledge or ignorance of the facts sought to be elicited thereby would materially influence the action of the insurer.” The rule thus tersely laid down followed the decision in the case of Empire Life Ins. Co. v. Jones, 14 Ga. App. 647 (82 S. E. 62).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Empire Life Insurance v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Ætna Life Insurance v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Mutual Life Insurance v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by37 opinions
- Preston v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Golden v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- James B. Woods, Sr. v. Independent Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.