Legal Opinion
Hopkins Manufacturing Corp. v. Cequent Performance Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 12, 2016No. Case No. 14-2208-JARPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation (“Hopkins”) filed this single-count action for alleged patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,837,551 (“’551 Patent”). On February 10, 2015, this Court granted a motion to stay the case pending inter partes review (“IPR”) of the patent by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). This matter is before the Court on Defendant Cequent Performance Products, Inc.’s (“Cequent”) Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Lift the Stay (Doc. 27). The motions are fully briefed…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- NOVEDEA SYSTEMS, INC v. COLABERRY, INCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2022