Legal Opinion

Meier v. Ma-Do Bars, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harvey, J.

This is an action for serious personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while attempting to ride a “mechanical bull” owned and operated by defendant Clean Snow Corporation. There appears to be no significant issue on this appeal as to the respective liabilities and duties of defendants Paul Solodar and Clean Snow Corporation. It is presumed that Paul Solodar was the owner and in complete control of Clean Snow Corporation. Because their interests are identical insofar as the issue on this appeal is concerned, we shall refer to both defendants collectively as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. James v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Wurzer v. Seneca Sport Parachute ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bacchiocchi v. Ranch Parachute Club, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Miranda v. Hampton Auto Raceway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Lemoine v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Smith v. Lebanon Valley Auto Racing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API