Legal Opinion

Wurzer v. Seneca Sport Parachute Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1978PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff Albert Wurzer paid defendants Seneca Sport Parachute Club ("SSPC”) and Howard F. Martin, Jr., a fee to enter upon defendants’ parachute and recreation center to take parachuting instructions and otherwise to use the defendants’ facilities and equipment. During the course of the day he allegedly broke a vertebra in his back. Alleging causes of action both contract and negligence, plaintiff Wurzer has sued both SSPC and Martin. Defendants in their amended answer admitted that they agreed to instruct the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. James v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bacchiocchi v. Ranch Parachute Club, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Miranda v. Hampton Auto Raceway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Lemoine v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Scrivener v. Sky's the Limit, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API