Legal Opinion
Pino v. Dalsheim
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 1983No. 81 Civ. 6915 (WCC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONNER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Wilfred Pino, Jr. (“Pino”) commenced this action, pro se, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his due process rights were violated by certain disciplinary actions taken against him while he was imprisoned at the Downstate Correctional Facility. Shortly after Pino filed his complaint, he was transferred to the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York, where he is presently incarcerated. Following plaintiff’s request that he be appointed counsel to represent him in this matter, the Court, through the Committee on Pro Se Litigation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mingo v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1978
- Reed v. EvansDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1978
- Reed v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dugar v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Bellamy v. McMickensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Alvarez v. SnyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- United States v. LentzDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Wooden v. NorrisDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.