Legal Opinion

United States v. Lentz

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 22, 2005No. 1:01 CR 150PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

In this remanded kidnapping for murder prosecution, the defendant seeks suppression of certain tape-recorded telephone communications between defendant Jay E. Lentz (“Lentz”) and his attorney regarding a murder-for-hire plot to eliminate key witnesses and the prosecutor in defendant’s case. At issue is (i) whether the tape recordings are protected by the attorney-client privilege and (ii) whether the tape recordings were illegally obtained in violation of defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights.

I

The facts relevant to this motion to suppress occurred…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. LentzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. State of Tennessee v. Howard Hawk WillisTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. RLI Insurance v. Conseco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  4. United States v. RamseyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  5. Bumgardner-Lockamy v. LoganDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API