United States v. Lentz
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
In this remanded kidnapping for murder prosecution, the defendant seeks suppression of certain tape-recorded telephone communications between defendant Jay E. Lentz (“Lentz”) and his attorney regarding a murder-for-hire plot to eliminate key witnesses and the prosecutor in defendant’s case. At issue is (i) whether the tape recordings are protected by the attorney-client privilege and (ii) whether the tape recordings were illegally obtained in violation of defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights.
I
The facts relevant to this motion to suppress occurred…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. LentzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- State of Tennessee v. Howard Hawk WillisTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- RLI Insurance v. Conseco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- United States v. RamseyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Bumgardner-Lockamy v. LoganDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.