Legal Opinion
Hochstadt v. Orange Broadcast
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 29, 1991No. 90-2752PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
588 So.2d 51 (1991)
A.M. HOCHSTADT, Appellant,
v.
ORANGE BROADCAST, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 90-2752.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 29, 1991.
Norman Malinski, Miami, for appellant.
Corlett, Killian, Ober & Levi and Love Phipps, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
JORGENSON, Judge.
A.M. Hochstadt appeals from an order of final summary judgment entered on the basis of collateral estoppel. We affirm.
In 1984, Hochstadt loaned $53,400 to his nephew Michael Siegel, d/b/a Pacific Metrocom Northwest. The loan was made payable to Orange…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aerojet-General Corp. v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Ronald Basil Hart, Jr. v. Yamaha-Parts Distributors, Inc., Yamaha International Corporation, Yamaha Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Robert C. Stovall, Jr. v. Price Waterhouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Department Hrs v. BjmSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Baxas Howell Mobley, Inc. v. BP Oil Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Costello v. the Curtis Bldg. PartnershipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- United Services Auto. Ass'n v. SelzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Suniland Associates, Ltd. v. Wilbenka, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.