Arsenault v. Lepage
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
The statement of the presiding justice had no legal effect, since it did not result in any specific finding of fact or ruling of law. Beaudette &c. Co. v. Therrien, 81 N. H. 117. The case was simply one in which a proceeding in equity to recover compensation under P. L., c. 178, was adjusted by the parties.
Section 35 of chapter 178 provides that “weekly payments due under this chapter shall not be assignable or subject to levy, execution, attachment or satisfaction of debts.” The legislative intention to exempt all classes of compensation from trustee-process or other forms of attachment is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mulhall v. Nashua Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
- Holland v. Morley Button Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
- Barber Ex Rel. Barber v. George R. Jones Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
- Hinman v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Beaudette & Graham Co. v. TherrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Semprini v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
- Billingslea v. TartellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945