Legal Opinion

Beaudette & Graham Co. v. Therrien

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.

Upon the facts determined at the trial the defendant is as matter of law entitled to judgment, as claimed in the brief statement, for the excess of the amount found as damages for breach of warranty over the amount due on the notes. Johnson v. Association, 68 N. H. 437. The exception to the denial of his motion therefor is sustained.

The ■ exception was seasonably taken. A party is not called on to object or except until he is “aggrieved by the ruling, direction, or judgment of the superior court.” Laws 1901, c. 78, s. 5. If at the conference the court had informed counsel he proposed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. White Mountain Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerry v. NeugebauerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Arsenault v. LepageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API