State v. Merritt

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

In this court-tried case, Carl M. Merritt (Defendant), appeals his conviction of “Driving Under Revocation.” Defendant only raises one point, asserting that the Information upon which he was convicted failed to charge the essential elements of a crime under § 302.321.1 For that reason, says Defendant, the court was without, jurisdiction to render its judgment. No brief was “ e<* “Y State,

Reproduced from the record is the following Information upon which Defendant was convicted:_

[[Image here]]

*6Review of the Information shows Defendant was charged with a violation of § 302.321…