Legal Opinion

Dill v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1924No. 6 Div. 398PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickbn, P. J.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense of murder in the second degree and a sentence of 12 years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary this defendant appealed.

The record in this case is voluminous, as a matter oí fact unnecessarily so; there being no reason under the law why the oral charge and the given and refused charges should be included both in the record proper and also in the bill of exceptions, as here appears. These charges cover more than 40, pages of this transcript, and we think it not out of place to state that they need appear only in the record, and that it is a waste of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Lipscomb v. McClellanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Boshell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API