Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Stietz

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 15, 1884Published

Decision on motion for judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

McAdam, Ch. J.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a foreign corporation, created under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and that, by indenture of lease in writing made between it and the defendant, the defendant hired from it certain premises for a specified term, and at a stated rent. It then alleges that the defendant failed to pay the quarter’s rent which became due May 1, 1884, and for this rent, amounting to $500, the plaintiff demands judgment.

The defendant by not denying has admitted the execution of the indenture sued upon (Code, § 522).

The defendant in his answer…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Township of Pine Grove v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Chester Glass Co. v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  4. Methodist Episcopal Union Church v. . PickettNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Steam Navigation Co. v. WeedNew York Supreme Court · 1853

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API