Commonwealth of Pa. v. Dougherty
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gawthrop, J.,
The defendant stands convicted of the possession, sale, furnishing and transportation of intoxicating liquor in violation of the Prohibition Enforcement Act of March 27, 1923, P. L. 34. The only complaints made in his behalf in this appeal are that the- charge of the court was insufficient, first, because there was a failure to instruct the jury as to the weight to be given- the ■ testimony of an accomplice who was an admitted perjurer ; and second, because there was ' a failure to instruct the .jury as to the meaning of the term “reasonable doubt.” As there ivas only a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrasseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- State v. TeahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Baumgartner v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Plachy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Commonwealth v. BerneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth of Pa. v. ScutackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932