Legal Opinion
Frederick v. City of Portland
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 26, 1995No. Civ. No. 94-40-HAPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge:
On March 9, 1995, the court granted summary judgment to the following defendants: (1) the City of Portland (“City”); (2) the Portland Development Commission (“PDC”); (3) the Metropolitan Exposition-Recreation Commission (“MERC”); (4) the Portland Trail Blazers, Inc. (“TBI”); and (5) the Oregon Arena Corporation (“OAC”).1 On March 31, 1995, final judgment was entered. Thereafter, each defendant submitted a bill of costs either independently or jointly with another defendant. The matter now before the court is plaintiffs’ objections to defendants’ cost…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Timberland Design, Inc. And William C. Barnsley v. First Service Bank for SavingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Leftwich v. Harris-Stowe State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Valley v. Ocean Sky LimoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1997
- Alexander Manufacturing, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership & Trust v. Illinois Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Aloha Tower Associates Piers 7, 8 & 9, Ltd. Partnership v. Millennium Aloha, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. BIOGEN IDEC MA INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.