Legal Opinion

Neenah Foundry Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 20, 2000No. Slip Op. 00-7; Court 99-07-00441PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion & Order

AQUILINO, Judge.

Claiming their current circumstances give rise to an issue of first impression, come now the plaintiffs with an application to enjoin the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA”) from instructing the Customs Service to discontinue suspension of liquidation and collection of cash deposits on and after January 1, 2000 for entries of merchandise theretofore within the ambit of Certain Iron Metal Castings From India: Countervailing Duty Order, 45 Fed. Reg. 68,650 (Oct. 16, 1980), per the ITA notice of its revocation published November…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Borlem S.A.—Empreedimentos Industriais v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Borlem S.A.-Empreedimentos Industriais v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corus Group PLC v. BushUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  2. Elkem Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  3. NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  4. Neenah Foundry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  5. Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API