Mark Hamilton v. Dora Schriro
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Mark Juan Hamilton, an American Indian, initiated the present action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Missouri prison officials (prison offi-ciáis) violated his First Amendment right to free exercise of religion by requiring him to cut his hair and by denying him access to a sweat lodge. Applying the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb, the district court enjoined prison officials from enforcing a hair length regulation and ordered them to provide a weekly sweat lodge ceremony. Prison officials appeal. Because the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hamilton v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996