Legal Opinion

Mark Hamilton v. Dora Schriro

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1996No. 94-3845PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Mark Juan Hamilton, an American Indian, initiated the present action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Missouri prison officials (prison offi-ciáis) violated his First Amendment right to free exercise of religion by requiring him to cut his hair and by denying him access to a sweat lodge. Applying the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb, the district court enjoined prison officials from enforcing a hair length regulation and ordered them to provide a weekly sweat lodge ceremony. Prison officials appeal. Because the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API