Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Schriro

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1996No. 94-3845PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

74 F.3d 1545

64 USLW 2512

Mark Juan HAMILTON, Appellee,

United States of America, Intervenor,

v.

Dora SCHRIRO; Paul Delo; Jody Jackson; Bill Armontrout,

Appellants.

Coalition for the Free Exercise of Religion; Koinonia House

of Dupage County and Justice Fellowship.

No. 94-3845.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 1995.

Decided Jan. 12, 1996.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied April

1, 1996.*

Erwin O. Switzer, III, Assistant Attorney General (Susan D. Boresi, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Patricia A. Millett, Department…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. May v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Harris v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Diaz v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. WilgusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API