Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 15, 1974No. 72 Civil 375PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Defendant Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”) moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in this action brought by plaintiff as subrogee of Public Service Electric and Gas Company of New Jersey (“PSE&G”). The controversy centers about the breakdown of a turbine generator manufactured by Westinghouse for PSE&G and installed at its Hudson generating plant in Jersey City, New Jersey. Plaintiff seeks to recover $475,800 which it paid to PSE&G, pursuant to the terms of an insurance policy issued in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- The Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd. v. William Gluckin & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Morgan v. SylvesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Hycon Manufacturing Company v. H. Koch & Sons, a Partnership Consisting of M. P. Koch, W. L. Koch, H. M. Koch and R. Koch AbelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- JIG the Third Corp. v. Puritan Marine Insurance Underwriters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.