Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1977No. 7629SC1031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, made in his answer and at trial. This contention is the subject of his assignments of error Nos. 1 and 2. He argued at trial and argues on appeal that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted for the reason that the description contained in the contract to convey is fatally defective thus rendering the contract insufficient to meet the requirements of the statute of frauds and therefore void.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Carlton v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Harry's Cadillac-Pontiac Co. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Prentice v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. VillinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Taylor v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Litvak v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Furr v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. In re: ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API