Legal Opinion
Ortiz Cameron v. Drug Enforcement Administration
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided March 7, 1997No. 94-2475 (HL), 94-2476 (HL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAFFITTE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds of res judicata and Plaintiffs’ failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In opposition to Defendant’s motion, Plaintiffs request a Rule 56(f) extension for the third time, argue against the applicability of res judicata, and cross-move for partial summary judgment on the grounds that the Supreme Court’s December 13, 1993 decision in United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, 510 U.S. 43, 114 S.Ct. 492, 126 L.Ed.2d 490 (1993) is retroactive to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ortiz-Cameron v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. SaccocciaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Ortiz-Cameron v. DrugCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998