Wilkins v. Miltimore
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.
The testatrix owned one hundred and twenty shares of the Wilkins Paper Box Company, Inc. which is and for many years has been “a successfully operated businéss corporation” and may be fairly described as a family corporation. In drafting her own will the testatrix made no specific disposition of all the shares themselves except “in the event of the sale or liquidation of the . . . Company.” Her interest in the corporation is not mentioned in the residuary clause and is confined to the second paragraph of the will. While the shares would pass under the residuary clause if she so intended…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goodwin v. New England Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Dixon v. DixonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
- Ireland v. HudsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Work v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Bastianelli v. Toco International, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Murray v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Estate of DoescherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL TRUST COMPANY v. HuntoonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.