Hill v. Ogrodnik
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtCapotosto, J.
This is a bill in equity to remove, as a cloud on title, certain building restrictions appearing in complainants’ deed to a lot on a plat of land in the city of Cranston. Service personally or by publication was had on all parties in interest. The respondents August F. and Katherine Clauberg, husband and wife, filed an answer in the nature of a cross bill to enjoin violation of the restrictions. A decree pro confesso was entered as to all other respondents. No procedural question is involved. The cause was heard in the superior court on bill, answer, replication and proof. A decree was…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- McArthur v. Hood Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Barton v. Moline Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Booker v. Old Dominion Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Goodwin Bros. v. Combs Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Lebo v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Ridgewood Homeowners Ass'n v. MignaccaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Duffy v. MolloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Farrell v. MEADOWBROOK CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.