Legal Opinion

Burda v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Plaintiff maintains this action in equity to set aside an appropriation of a triangular parcel of land taken pursuant to the provisions of section 676-a of the Conservation Law for parkway purposes. Plaintiff contends that the acts of defendant, Palisades Interstate Park Commission, were illegal because the appropriation of the triangular parcel described in Exhibit “A” attached to the complaint constituted an appropriation of more land than necessary for the public purpose.

Defendant, Palisades Interstate Park Commission, moves to dismiss the complaint upon the ground (1) that it does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Waterloo Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. ShanahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Matter of City of New York (Ely Avenue)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. McCabe v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Schantz v. Genesee State Park CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cuglar v. Power AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Burda v. Palisades Interstate Park CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API