State Ex Rel. Mink v. Wallace
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, Presiding Judge.
Relators have filed a petition for a writ of prohibition and suggestions in support. Respondent has filed suggestions in opposition. As permitted by Rule 84.24(j), we dispense with the filing of an answer, further briefing and argument and issue our peremptory writ of prohibition.
As required by the terms of its City Charter, the City of Maplewood (“Ma-plewood”) must submit to the voters of Maplewood the issue of whether two ordinances authorizing a proposed development should be repealed. The City Charter requires that the issues be submitted for a vote not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Missouri National Education Ass'n v. Missouri State Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Querry v. State Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bruner v. Workman Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Shannon v. HinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of St. Louis v. K & K Investment, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aufenkamp v. GrabillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Columbia Sussex Corp. v. Missouri Gaming CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Cook v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Singer v. SiedbandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Royster v. RizzoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.