Legal Opinion
The Mabel
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 4, 1929No. 17PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The barge Bristol, a few inches over 150 feet in length, was riding at anchor on the Robbins Reef anchorage ground. She had a light aft upon her cabin, 19 feet from the deck, and the District Judge found upon disputed testimony that she had a forward light 22 feet from the deck. This light, if in place, was therefore only three feet higher than the after light, and not 15, as article 11 of the Inland Rules requires. The tug Mabel, with a barge on her port hand, was bound down the bay, and, carelessly running over the anchorage grounds, did not for some reason see the lights of the Bristol…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The EuropeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- The SifCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- The Transfer No. 8Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Phinney v. The Le LionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wills v. Amerada Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Wills v. Amerada Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Seaboard Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Rederi Ab/disaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Permanente Steamship Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Otal Investments Ltd. v. M v. ClaryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.