Ely v. Whitlock
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiting
In these two consolidated actions for (1) malicious prosecution, (2) abuse of process, and (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress, we determine whether the motions for judgment are sufficient to state causes of action for each of these claims.
W.W. Whitlock and his son John D. Whitlock, both of whom are lawyers, each filed a motion for judgment against another lawyer, Rae H. Ely, seeking to recover compensatory and punitive damages based on separate counts of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and defamation. Later, each plaintiff added a fourth count alleging intentional…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Womack v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Donohoe Construction Co. v. Mount Vernon AssociatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Ruth v. FletcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Ayyildiz v. KiddSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Seventh District Committee v. GunterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Russo v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Delk v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Jordan v. ShandsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Giles v. Hill Lewis MarceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Levine v. McLeskeyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.