Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Commercial Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). But two questions require consideration. The trial judge instructed the jury:

“If you find for the plaintiff you will proceed to estimate his damages. The measure of the plaintiff’s *340damages will be the highest market value of the stock at any time during which it was wrongfully withheld from him.”

This instruction is not in accordance with the rule adopted by this court in Vos v. Child, Hulswit & Co., 171 Mich. 595 (43 L. R. A. [N. S.] 368), and followed in Wallace v. H. W. Noble & Co., 203 Mich. 58. The rule there announced and which is applicable here is that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wallace v. H. W. Noble & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Vos v. Child, Hulswit & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larson v. Van HornMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Holland Furnace Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API