Legal Opinion

Caiazza v. Carmine Marceno

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided December 22, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00784Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION JOSEPH CAIAZZA, on his own behalf and those similarly situated Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:18-cv-784-FtM-38MRM CARMINE MARCENO, Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER1 Before the Court is Defendant Carmine Marceno’s oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on his 29 U.S.C. § 207(k) defense. Marceno contends he established a work period of fourteen days for police officers. The Court grants the motion. LEGAL STANDARD Rule 50 governs motions for judgment as a matter of law made at the close of evidence or renewed after a jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alice T. Cleveland v. Home Shopping NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Marvin E. Birdwell, Gary C. Alexander, Martha L. Harbin Mark Henderson and Jeffrey W. Wagnon v. City of Gadsden, Alabama, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Dontray Chaney v. City of Orlando, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Huff v. DeKalb County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Roosevelt Watkins v. The City of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API