Farnum v. Mesiti Development
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The plaintiff, Benjamin G. Famum, appeals from an order of the single justice of this court, affirming an award pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 6F, by a Land Court judge of $218,537.29 in attorney’s fees and costs to defendant Mesiti Development (Mesiti) based on a finding in the Land Court that *420Farnum’s claim was wholly insubstantial, frivolous, and not advanced in good faith.
Background. Mesiti sought a special permit from the planning board of North Andover (board) to construct ninety-six town houses on a locus across the street from land owned by Famum. Famum, an objecting abutter, claimed as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. CronkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Powers v. H.B. Smith Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Custody of KaliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Ronald R.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Braun v. BraunMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Troy Industries, Inc. v. Samson Manufacturing Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Terry. v. TerryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- Hubbard v. GodboutMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009