Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1905No. Docket No. 44PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Ottawa; Padgbam, J. Mandamus by Harry T. Bishop to compel the board of supervisors of Ottawa county to audit and allow a claim for services rendered during an epidemic of smallpox. There was an order granting the writ, and respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This is & proceeding by writ of certiorari to review the action of the circuit court for Ottawa county in a certain mandamus proceeding. Harry T. Bishop was employed by the health officer of the city of Grand Haven as quarantine guard, at the time of a smallpox epidemic in said city, to watch during the nighttime a certain house in which there were patients infected with said disease, and to prevent the spread thereof. He so acted for 35 nights, charging for such services $1.50 per night. An itemized bill for such service was approved by the said health officer, and at a meeting of the board…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Kalkaska SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Township of Cedar Creek v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. McKillop v. Board of Supervisors of Cheboygan Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Village of Durand v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. City of Monroe v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. City of Detroit v. GrummondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. Keho v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API