Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Grummond

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 25, 1914No. 2478PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Alexis C. Angelí, Judge. Action by U. Grant Grummond against the City of Detroit. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN, District Judge.

This case is here, after the lapse of ten jrears, for the second time. At the former hearing a judgment in favor of defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, for the sum of $16,366.66, entered upon a verdict of á jury, was reversed, with direction to award a new trial. The opinion was by Judge Severens, and is reported in .121 Fed. 963, 58 C. C. A. 301. It is assumed that the reader hereof has read that opinion and the recital of facts which precedes it. The new trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff for the sum of $7,500,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McElwee v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Elliott v. Kalkaska SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Township of Cedar Creek v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Rae v. Mayor of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Wilkinson v. Township of Long RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. City of AllentownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Montgomery v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API