Tige Scholl v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
In this case the plaintiff in error was convicted of assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree. The only question presented by the assignments of error as argued by counsel for plaintiff in error' challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. .The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of the State v. Lindsey, 88 Fla. 135, 101 Sou. 273, in which the Court say:
“The law of justifiable homicide by self-defense has many times been set forth in decisions of this Court. There must be reasonable grounds to apprehend a design to commit a felony or to do some…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pinder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
- Danford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Linsley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Landrum v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dias v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Rasley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Holland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Vila v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- J. Y. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.