Legal Opinion

Sparrow Chisholm Co. v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 14, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The land with the building thereon numbered 140-144 Essex Street in Boston was taken on September 15, 1947, by the city of Boston in the exercise of its power under the authority of St. 1946, c. 474, to provide public off street parking facilities. At the time of the taking the premises were owned in fee by 144 Essex Street Corp., hereinafter called Essex, and a portion of the building was occupied by Sparrow Chisholm Co., hereinafter called Chisholm, under a written lease for five years dated November 16, 1944, which contained the following provision: “Provided, always, that in case the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co. v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. In Re Improvement of Third Steeet, St. Paul. Buckbee-Mears Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. O'Brien v. BallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bowser v. ChalifourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Lowell Housing Authority v. Save-Mor Furniture Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Newman v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Universal Container Corp. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. County of McLennan v. ShinaultCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API