Legal Opinion
Becker v. Computer Sciences Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 22, 1982No. Civ. A. H-80-1676PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion for leave to file amended answer and counterclaim. Through its motion, defendant seeks to inject into this lawsuit a counterclaim predicated upon a California statute which provides a cause of action for the unauthorized eavesdropping on confidential communications by an electronic amplifying or recording device. Not surprisingly, plaintiff is opposed to defendant’s motion.
On April 12,1982 the Court held a conference in chambers with counsel for both parties in attendance. Following the presentation of the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
- Stratton v. SteeleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Rein v. Koons Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Industrial Indemnity Company v. Chapman and CutlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Sharp v. Ally Fin., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.