Legal Opinion
Suggs v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 18, 1996No. 96-80PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
681 So.2d 870 (1996)
Joseph SUGGS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-80.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
October 18, 1996.
Joseph Edward Suggs, Lowell, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
We deny Suggs' petition for writ of habeas corpus. In his petition, he urges that the trial court erred in resentencing him in his absence. Suggs is entitled to no relief.
In the first place, Suggs raised this identical issue in an appeal from a denial of a motion filed…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Isley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Atkins v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Golz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Windisch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Sneed v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Moore v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004