Legal Opinion

Sneed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 16, 2000No. 1D99-3111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of the summary denial of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

In 1991, Appellant was convicted of the following offenses: Count I, Armed Kidnapping, a life felony; Count II, Sexual Battery, a life felony; Count III, Aggravated Battery, a second degree felony; and Count IV, False Imprisonment, a third degree felony. In this 3.800 action, Appellant claims his sentence was illegally enhanced to habitual offender status for Counts I and II, both of which are life felonies.

Under the law in effect at the time of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MancinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Lamont v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Summers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Nathan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Suggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API