Legal Opinion
Hassanali v. Attorney General
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 30, 1984No. 84-2772PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs filed this action pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act (Act), specifically 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101-1503, and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706. Plaintiffs request that the Court declare that the denial of the sixth preference visa petition for Shiraz Hassanali (Hassanali), and the efforts to deport Hassanali and his family are “contrary to the applicable laws and regulations, unsupported by reasonable, probative, and substantial evidence, and an abuse of discretion.” Plaintiffs seek to have the Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nazario Castaneda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Nooria Madany v. William French SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Chan Kwan Chung v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- K.R.K. Irvine, Inc., and Jorge Torres v. Michael Landon, District Director, and Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buletini v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Masonry Masters, Inc. v. MeeseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987