Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Board of Review of the Ind. Com'n

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1986No. 860058PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The claimant Harold C. Hurst seeks review from the decision of the Board of Review denying him unemployment benefits. The Board’s decision affirmed an administrative law judge ruling that Hurst did not have good cause to quit and that it was not inconsistent with equity and good conscience to deny him benefits. We affirm.

Hurst was employed as a sales representative with Terra Diamond Industrial, Inc. (Terra Diamond), between May 1,1984, and August 8, 1985. For the first eight months, he worked his assigned territory of southern California and Nevada while living in Salt Lake City. His rent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Richards v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Smith v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF INDUS. COM'NUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Box Elder County v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Department of Workforce ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Sawyer v. Dept of Workforce ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API