Legal Opinion
Siegmund Strauss, Inc. v. East 149th Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2010PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McGuire, J.
Plaintiff Siegmund Strauss, Inc., a wholesale food and beverage distributor, entered into negotiations with defendants Windsor Brands, Ltd. and Twinkle Import Co. to merge their businesses and operate in premises leased by Windsor at 520 Exterior Street (also known as 110 East 149th Street), Bronx, New York (the premises). Windsor had a lease agreement with defendant East 149th Realty Corp. (the landlord) that commenced on September 1, 1992 and expired on August 31, 2007. Defendant Twinkle was a wholesale distributor of food products and paper goods which, prior…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Paru v. Mutual of America Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Barrett Japaning, Inc. v. BialobrodaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by9 opinions
- Siegmund Strauss, Inc. v. East 149th Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Siegmund Strauss, Inc. v. East 149th Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Retta v. 160 Water Street Associates, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Crawford v. New York City Department of Information Technology & TelecommunicationsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Lambrecht v. Bank of America Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.