Legal Opinion
Siegmund Strauss, Inc. v. East 149th Realty Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 23, 2012PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jones, J.
The primary question in this commercial dispute involving, among other things, the right to a leasehold to certain commercial property, is whether, pursuant to the “necessarily affects” requirement (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]), defendants’ appeal to the Appellate Division from a judgment declaring plaintiff Siegmund Strauss, Inc. (Strauss) the lawful tenant of the subject property brought up for review two non-final Supreme Court orders: one dismissing defendants’ counterclaims and third-party complaint (2007 NY Slip Op 32436[U] [2007]) and the other denying defendants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Karlin v. IVF America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bartoo v. BuellNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Scarangella v. Thomas Built Buses, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Draper v. Georgia Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Siegmund Strauss, Inc. v. East 149th Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lopez v. New York City Department of Environmental ProtectionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Oakes v. PatelNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Matter of McFadden v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Mariano v. FiorvanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Siegmund Strauss, Inc. v. East 149th Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.