Legal Opinion

General Electric Credit Corp. v. Beyerlein

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Macken, J.

On July 3, 1964 Bowl-Mor Company, Inc. and defendants made a agreement whereby Bowl-Mor leased to defendants four automatic ten-pin setting machines, the agreement calling for a total rental of $39,600 payable in installments over a period of years. The lease provided: “ The lessor may assign all its right, title and interest under this lease including the payments hereunder but the assignee shall not be held responsible for any of the lessor’s obligations ”. The lease was assigned to plaintiff July 30, 1964. Defendants have defaulted in payment of rental and this action is brought to recover…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quality Finance Co. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Fall River Trust Co. v. B. G. Browdy, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. NoblettDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oakley v. National Western Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Tilbury ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. BeyerleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API