Legal Opinion
General Electric Credit Corp. v. Noblett
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 29, 1967No. Civ. No. 66-375PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EUBANKS, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced this diversity action on October 5, 1966, alleging generally in its complaint that defendant and Bowl-Mor Company, Inc., entered into a written contract on May 20, 1965 whereunder defendant leased from BowlMor eight automatic ten pin setting machines. According to the terms of that rental lease contract defendant agreed to pay, in installments, certain specified sums of money for the use of the machines, the first installment becoming due on September 6, 1965. The rental lease agreement provided, among, other things, that “The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Quality Finance Co. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Charles L. Ricker v. B-W Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- First Nat. Bank of Elgin v. HustedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Norfolk County Trust Co. v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Mid-America Corporation v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ernest v. Noblett v. General Electric Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Chemical Bank v. Rinden Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- A. L. Jackson Chevrolet, Inc. v. OxleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. BeyerleinNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Minnesota Paints, Inc. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970