Coomer v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.2
Mark Coomer appeals his convictions, after a bench trial, of two counts of child molesting, class B and C felonies, and Incest, a class D felony.
We affirm.
Coomer challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his convictions in two respects. First, Coomer contends that the record contains insufficient evidence of penetration to sustain the class B felony child molesting conviction and the convietion of incest. Second, he argues that the State failed to introduce any evidence from which it could be determined that the charged acts occurred during the period alleged.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fozzard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Tapp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Traver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Dinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Hobson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gamble v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gamble v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jordin C. Shoda v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019