Legal Opinion
Central Dover Development Corp. v. Town of Dover
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 6, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for the de facto taking of a parcel of real property, (1) the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered September 2, 1993, which, inter alia, denied *368the plaintiff’s motion to (a) declare that it is the real party in interest and (b) grant Wayne G. Tanner leave to intervene, and granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and (2) the defendant cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered April 12, 1990, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Key International Manufacturing, Inc. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Matter of Van Etten v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Prudco Realty Corp. v. PalermoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaplan v. Queens Optometric Associates, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Central Dover Development Corp. v. Town of DoverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998