Legal Opinion
Semro v. Halstead Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 30, 1985No. 85 C 0191PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
For the reasons that follow, plaintiff Ronald Semro’s (“Semro”) motion to reconsider our order of August 5, 1985, transferring this ease to the Central District of California, is conditionally denied. However, before reaching that issue, we must reject defendant Halstead Enterprises’ (“Halstead”) argument that we lack jurisdiction to rule on the motion to reconsider.
Our transfer order was entered on August 5, 1985. On August 13, 1985, the District Court’s Clerk, Stuart Cunningham, transferred the file and papers to the Central District of California.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- William Rodger Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGuire Arthur Everett Small, Jr. v. Honorable George L. Hart, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Robert S. Solomon v. Continental American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Thomas F. Drabik v. Honorable Thomas F. Murphy, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Database America, Inc. v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- In Re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Wilson-Cook Medical, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Huff v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- In Re Wilson-Cook Medical, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.