Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Updike

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In ejectment. On motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by the

Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs, on the trial, having shown a clear documentary title to the premises in dispute, the defence rested solely on the claim of adverse possession. The burthen of proof was, therefore, upon the defendants. It was incumbent upon them to establish the fact of adverse possession beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury having found for the defen dants, a new trial is ashed, upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evi deuce.

The evidence on the part of the defendant does not clearly establish the fact of adverse…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilomay Holding Co. v. Peninsula Land Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. DeBow v. HatfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Morrissey v. JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API